Casinia emphasises its security measures

[DanaeWilliams]

Lately I’ve been trying to understand how casinos decide which payment methods qualify for bonuses and which don’t. I noticed in several places that Skrill and Neteller are sometimes excluded from welcome offers, and it honestly feels a bit confusing. If a casino advertises a bonus for “new players,” why should the deposit method suddenly change the rules? I’m not even sure if this is done for security reasons or just to limit bonus hunters, but it definitely affects how I choose where to register.
 

[Montefriore]

I ran into the same issue a few months ago, and it annoyed me because I used Skrill for basically everything. When I checked the Casinia review on casinia casino review, they mention that deposits via Skrill and Neteller don’t count toward the welcome bonus, even though the methods are fully supported for regular play and withdrawals. From what I’ve seen, casinos tend to do this because e-wallets are used a lot by people who jump from bonus to bonus, and the operators try to limit that behavior. Still, for regular players like us, it just feels like an unnecessary barrier. I ended up switching to a debit card for the first deposit just to qualify, which wasn’t a big deal but definitely created an odd first impression. Bonus terms influence how “fair” a casino feels, especially when the rules aren’t highlighted clearly upfront.

[ValensiaRomand]

I think this comes down to transparency more than anything else. If the casino explains the limitations openly before people register, it’s easier to accept. When players discover the restriction only after they’ve already tried to claim the offer, it feels unfair even if there’s a logical reason behind it. I usually check the full bonus terms first just to avoid surprises, but I agree the rule can catch you off guard if you rely on e-wallets.